Richardson v Phillips.
At the risk of raising the dreaded "time of death" debate again, wouldn't it be better if the last line said something like "Richardson's testimony conflicts with Phillip's estimated time of death" rather than "Richardson's testimony calls Phillip's estimate into question"? Just for the sake of neutrality, since the latter suggests that Richardson's testimony is more trustworthy than Phillips. Magpie 02:00, 17 November 2008 (EST)
I'd agree with that, Magpie. Feel free to make that change. Thanks! --Spryder 12:45, 18 November 2008 (EST)